Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516752›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Predictive modeling of gestational weight gain: a machine learning multiclass classification study.

Audêncio Victor, Hellen Geremias Dos Santos, Gabriel Ferreira Santos Silva, Fabiano Barcellos Filho, Alexandre de Fátima Cobre, Liania A Luzia, Patrícia H C Rondó, Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto Filho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prenatal and birth-related risk factors for hypomineralised second primary molars: a prospective cohort study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Audêncio VictorSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, 01246904, São Paulo, Brazil. audenciovictor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-3639
Hellen Geremias Dos SantosOswaldo Cruz Foundation - Carlos Chagas Institute (ICC) Parana, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Gabriel Ferreira Santos SilvaSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, 01246904, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiano Barcellos FilhoSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, 01246904, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre de Fátima CobreDepartment of Statistics, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Liania A LuziaSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, 01246904, São Paulo, Brazil.
Patrícia H C RondóSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, 01246904, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alexandre Dias Porto Chiavegatto FilhoSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo (USP), Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715, São Paulo, 01246904, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/03333-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/07936-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational weight gain (GWG) is a critical factor influencing maternal and fetal health. Excessive or insufficient GWG can lead to various complications, including gestational diabetes, hypertension, cesarean delivery, low birth weight, and preterm birth. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models to predict GWG categories: below, within, or above recommended guidelines.

methodsWe analyzed data from the Araraquara Cohort, Brazil, which comprised 1557 pregnant women with a gestational age of 19 weeks or less. Predictors included socioeconomic, demographic, lifestyle, morbidity, and anthropometric factors. Five machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, LightGBM, AdaBoost, CatBoost, and XGBoost) were employed for model development. The models were trained and evaluated using a multiclass classification approach. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC), F1 score and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC).

resultsThe outcomes were categorized as follows: GWG within recommendations (28.7%), GWG below (32.5%), and GWG above recommendations (38.7%). The XGBoost presented the best overall model, achieving an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for GWG within, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.65 for GWG above. The LightGBM also performed well with an AUC-ROC of 0.79 for predicting GWG within recommendations, 0.76 for GWG below, and 0.624 for GWG above. The most important predictors of GWG were pre-gestational BMI, maternal age, glycemic profile, hemoglobin levels, and arm circumference.

conclusionMachine learning models can effectively predict GWG categories, offering a valuable tool for early identification of at-risk pregnancies. This approach can enhance personalized prenatal care and interventions to promote optimal pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainMachine LearningAdultBody Mass IndexBrazilFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsROC CurveYoung AdultAraraquara cohortFetal healthGestational weight gainMachine learningMaternal healthPrediction models

Identifiers

PMID39516752
PMCPMC11549867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.