ArticleBMC public health2024
The impact of internet medical service on rural gender inequality in health opportunity: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal trend and influencing factors of high-risk pregnancy in China: a nationwide longitudinal analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Association of Outpatient Cost-Sharing Policy with Health and Economic Outcomes for Rural Children in China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bridging the digital health divide: digital endowment, informal social participation, and health inequality among older adults.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing popularity of Internet medical service may have alleviated the gender inequality in health opportunity faced by rural women. However, research to ascertain the association between Internet medical service and gender inequality in health opportunity is scarce. This study explored the impact of Internet medical service on gender inequality in health opportunity among rural women and the underlying mechanisms involved.
methodsA multistage stratified cross-sectional survey was conducted across six counties in three provinces in China, yielding 3,108 responses for a 97.13% response rate. The questionnaire was used to collect information on Internet healthcare use, health status, health behaviors, social activities and personal exercise, chronic disease status, and demographic and socio-economic characteristics of the participants. Based on Roemer's theory of equality of opportunity (EOP), we established a decomposition strategy for the fairness gap between genders, which we used for the measurement of the gender inequality in health opportunity Fixed effects models, propensity score matching (PSM), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were utilized to explore the impact of Internet medical service on rural gender inequality in health opportunity.
resultsOn average, rural women experienced a gender health fairness gap of 1.63. Internet medical service significantly mitigated this inequality (β = -0.0602, P = 0.0002), and this finding remained significant across propensity score matching (PSM) and LASSO regression analyses. Mechanistic analysis revealed that human capital positively moderates this effect (β = -0.0510, P < 0.01), while income (β = 0.0370, P < 0.001) and marital status (β = 0.2039, P < 0.001) have negative moderating effects.
conclusionsBy focusing on gender inequality in the digital era, this study highlights the mitigating role of Internet medical service on gender inequality in health opportunity in rural areas. This study proposes and validates the mechanisms through which Internet medical service alleviates gender inequality in health opportunity, suggesting that human capital amplifies this effect, while high personal income and marital status attenuate this effect. These findings contribute to understanding how the digital age can narrow gender health opportunity equality, providing support for future interventions aimed at promoting health equity and gender equality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.