ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided spinal fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a GRADE-assessed meta-analysis on surgical parameters, clinical outcomes, and complications.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Association of glucose metabolism status and paraspinal muscle degeneration with chronic pain after endoscopic lumbar decompression: a multicentre retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study was aimed to explore the mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.
methodsThe clinical data of young and middle-aged patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed and divided into an observation group and a control group according to surgical methods. The observation group was treated with minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) combined with orthopedic robot-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw fixation; while the control group underwent traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Perioperative indicators, waist and leg pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications were compared between groups.
resultsA total of 32 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were included in this study, with the average age of 50.3 ± 2.7 years old. There were 17 patients in the observation group and 15 patients in the control group. Although the new surgical technique for the observation group may require longer operative time, it showed significant advantages in reducing intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and shortening hospital stay. These benefits might result in faster recovery for patients, reduced risk of complications, and improved overall quality of life. The new technology was also significantly better compared to the traditional method in terms of VAS scores and ODI at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. These results provided patients with better treatment options and potentially a faster path to recovery. One case with infectious incision in the observation group and one case with intraspinal hematoma formation in the control group were observed. However, there was no statistical difference in the complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05).
conclusionThe non-contact orthopedic robot navigation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis was demonstrated to be minimally invasive, precise, and stable surgical method. It is a treatment option worth considering for suitable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.