Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516706›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2025

Role of the CIBMTR biorepository and registry in precision transplantation research.

Ryan D Guerrettaz, Stephen R Spellman, Kristin M Page

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan D GuerrettazDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), Milwaukee, WI, USA. rguerrettaz@mcw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6180-0170
Stephen R SpellmanCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research (CIBMTR), NMDP, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7271-8252
Kristin M PageDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational studies using registry-based data have become indispensable in our management of patients receiving hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or cellular therapies (CT) for hematologic malignancies. These registries support studies that describe the natural history of disease, evaluate clinical effectiveness, or measure safety and quality of patient care. To complement registries, biobanks exist as an essential partner to provide insight on genetic, molecular, and cellular processes. In this review, we discuss and provide examples of several biobank and registry collaborations that have advanced our knowledge in the field of HCT and CT, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research (CIBMTR) as a highlighted example. The CIBMTR has collected data on over 650,000 patients and has over 60,000 paired donor recipient banked samples available for research. Biospecimens and clinical data from the CIBMTR have led to advancements in our knowledge and care of conditions such as acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), as well as our understanding of the roles of HLA typing and social determinants of health. Despite the utility in advancing research, registries and biobanks do not exist without challenges which are briefly reviewed. Nevertheless, the contributions of these resources in supporting HCT/CT research are noteworthy.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationPrecision MedicineRegistriesHumans

Identifiers

PMID39516706
PMCPMC11810599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.