ArticleBJC reports2024
Comparative efficacy of combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade vs. PD-1 monotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a real-world study.
Article in BJC reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative safety and survival outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in brain metastases from lung cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Genomic profiles and their associations with microsatellite instability status, tumor mutational burden, and programmed death ligand 1 expression in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn light of the substantial toxicity associated with combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade (ipilimumab and nivolumab), we assessed its efficacy and safety against anti-PD-1 monotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) in patients with metastatic melanoma under real-world conditions.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study involving 962 patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma who initiated adjuvant treatment between January 2017 and December 2021 across outpatient clinics in the United States. We adjusted for variables such as age, sex, ECOG performance status, comorbidity index, social deprivation index, metastatic sites, BRAF mutation status, and year of treatment. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and post-treatment hospitalizations, analyzed using propensity score adjustment and inverse probability of treatment weighted Kaplan-Meier estimators.
resultsAfter adjusting for all variables, no significant difference in OS was observed between treatment protocols in the overall cohort (P = 0.417). In patients with multi-organ metastasis (involvement of more than two organ systems), combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade was associated with improved OS (P = 0.033). Conversely, monotherapy yielded significantly better OS in patients with oligo-organ metastasis (involvement of two or fewer organ systems; P = 0.008). Patients with oligo-organ metastasis also experienced higher hospitalization rates due to immune-related adverse events when treated with combination therapy (31.2% vs. 8.5%, P < 0.001).
conclusionsOur real-world data indicate that combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade is most beneficial for patients with multi-organ metastasis, while those with oligo-organ metastasis fare better with PD-1 monotherapy. The underlying reasons for these observations-whether they are due to differences in the characteristics of multi- and oligo-metastatic melanomas or the risk-benefit profile of the therapies-remain to be elucidated. These findings underscore the need for a nuanced approach to treatment regimens for stage IV melanoma patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.