ArticleScientific reports2024
Deep learning method for detecting fluorescence spots in cancer diagnostics via fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Double-Stranded DNA Targeting Technologies.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Haematologic Diagnostics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Acta haematologica · 2026Review
- BDNet: A Real-Time Biomedical Image Denoising Network with Gradient Information Enhancement Loss.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Enhanced FISH Image Classification via CBAM-PPM-Optimized ResNet50 for Precision Cytogenetic Diagnosis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) is a technique for macromolecule identification that utilizes the complementarity of DNA or DNA/RNA double strands. Probes, crafted from selected DNA strands tagged with fluorophore-coupled nucleotides, hybridize to complementary sequences within the cells and tissues under examination. These are subsequently visualized through fluorescence microscopy or imaging systems. However, the vast number of cells and disorganized nucleic acid sequences in FISH images present significant challenges. The manual processing and analysis of these images are not only time-consuming but also prone to human error due to visual fatigue. To overcome these challenges, we propose the integration of medical imaging with deep learning to develop an automated detection system for FISH images. This system features an algorithm capable of quickly detecting fluorescent spots and capturing their coordinates, which is crucial for evaluating cellular characteristics in cancer diagnosis. Traditional models struggle with the small size, low resolution, and noise prevalent in fluorescent points, leading to significant performance declines. This paper offers a detailed examination of these issues, providing insights into why traditional models falter. Comparative tests between the YOLO series models and our proposed method affirm the superior accuracy of our approach in identifying fluorescent dots in FISH images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.