ArticleBJC reports2024
Temporal evolution and inter-patient heterogeneity in primary and recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in BJC reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncolytic viruses in head and neck cancer: therapeutic promise and translational challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Approaches with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles to Induce Ferroptosis and Overcome Radioresistance in Cancers.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHead and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are heterogeneous in terms of origin and aetiology. In addition, there is uncertainty about the genetic evolution from initial diagnosis to recurrence after primary treatments and further disease progression following systemic treatment. Changes in the genetic profile have implications on the selection of appropriate treatments for patients, especially in the era of targeted therapies and immunotherapies.
methodsWe analysed a cohort of nine HNSCC patients with metachronous recurrence. All patients had paired primary and recurrent samples suitable for whole-exome sequencing, while transcriptomic data from seven patients could be analysed (multiple recurrent samples collected at different time points were available for three patients).
resultsAt the genomic level, the recurrences shared a fraction of the somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) with the index primary tumours, but they also acquired many additional mutations, while losing only a few others. A similar behaviour was also observed when examining the changes of mutational signatures between primary and recurrent samples. Overall, recurrences appeared thus more genetically diverse than the respective primary tumours. The transcriptomic analysis showed that recurrent samples had lower immune cell presence, which was also confirmed by the multiplex immunofluorescence (IF) histology assays performed on the PhenoCycler platform. Several genes related to immune response were significantly downregulated compared to the primary samples.
conclusionsOur results underline the importance of analysing multiple samples per patient to obtain a more complete picture of the patient's tumour and advocate a re-biopsy in the event of recurrence and treatment failure, in order to select the most appropriate therapeutic strategy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.