ArticleBJC reports2024
Randomized phase II trial of weekly ixabepilone ± biweekly bevacizumab for platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer (NCT03093155): Updated survival and subgroup analyses.
Article in BJC reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03093155 (A Randomized Phase II Evaluation of Weekly Ixabepilone With or Without Biweekly Bevacizumab in Recurrent or Persistent Platinum-resistant/Refractory Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Phase II Evaluation of Weekly Ixabepilone With or Without Biweekly Bevacizumab in Recurrent or Persistent Platinum-resistant/Refractory Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancers
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies Candidate Genomic Features Associated with Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Ixabepilone-Based Treatment in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIxabepilone may retain activity in paclitaxel-resistant disease. We previously reported improved response rates (ORR), progression-free (PFS), and overall survival (OS) conferred by ixabepilone+bevacizumab (IXA + BEV) compared to monotherapy (IXA) in heavily pre-treated ovarian cancers. We now describe a mature data set. Subset analyses were performed in patients with different taxane sensitivities and dose modifications.
methodsPatients previously treated with paclitaxel were stratified by prior BEV and randomized to receive IXA 20 mg/m
resultsThirty-seven patients were randomized to IXA and 39 patients to IXA + BEV. At the final data cutoff (05/27/2023), ORR was higher in the IXA + BEV arm (38.4% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.003). Dose reductions were necessary in most participants but did not diminish PFS/OS benefits. Most patients were paclitaxel-refractory/-resistant (51%, n = 19/37;67%, n = 26/39); the remainder were taxane-sensitive. The addition of BEV to IXA conferred benefit in PFS (5.5 vs. 2.2 mo; HR 0.31, 90%CI 0.20-0.49, p < 0.001) and OS (10.3 vs. 6.0 mo; HR 0.56, 90%CI 0.38-0.84, p = 0.02) that persisted after adjusting for prior taxane response.
conclusionsIXA + BEV has activity in heavily pre-treated ovarian cancers and offers significant improvement in ORR and PFS/OS compared to IXA, despite prior taxane response and dose reductions. CLINICAL
trial registrationNCT03093155.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.