ArticleCommunications biology2024
3D keloid spheroid model: Development and application for personalized drug response prediction.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation skin wound healing related disease models with integration of immune cells.Protein & cell · 2026Review
- A panoramic analysis of keloid pathogenesis: multidimensional network regulation of genetics-immunity-metabolism-mechanical force.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Deciphering the cellular landscape of pathological scars.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
- Fibroblasts: A Molecular and Pathophysiological Perspective.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Mimicking the Complexity of Solid Tumors: How Spheroids Could Advance Cancer Preclinical Transformative Approaches.Cancers · 2025Article
- Leveraging Microneedles for Raised Scar Management.Polymers · 2025Review
- Keratin-Mediated Selective Inhibition in Proliferation and Selective Apoptosis of Keloid Fibroblasts.Biomaterials research · 2025Article
- Gene Expression ofIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on keloid is limited by the lack of proper in vitro and animal model reflecting in vivo status. Based on heterogeneity of keloid and important role of endothelial cells in its pathogenesis, a novel 3D in vitro keloid spheroid prepared with keloid fibroblasts and endothelial cells was evaluated in this study. Commercial cell lines of keloid fibroblasts and endothelial cells were used at various cellular ratios to generate keloid spheroids to determine the optimal condition. Keloid spheroids from three keloid patients were also made and their usefulness as in vitro models, including their responses to drugs, were assessed. Spheroids with higher endothelial cell proportions exhibited increased viability and propagation ability. Patient-derived keloid spheroids showed heterogeneity which might reflect individual clinical conditions. The optimal ratio of fibroblasts to endothelial cells was determined to be 4:1 for keloid spheroids based on gene expression and viability analyses. Patient-derived keloid spheroid showed better keloidal changes in genetic expressions than 2D monolayer culture. Spheroids exhibited varied responses and resistance to each drug used for keloids, depending on the cell type used. 3D keloid spheroids might provide an effective in vitro model for investigating disease pathogenesis and appropriate treatment modalities for future precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.