Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516552›Full record

ReviewBJC reports2023

The role of virtual consultations in cancer genetics: challenges and opportunities introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Melody G Redman, Vernie Aguda, Rhys Dore, Jen O Lim, Beverley Speight, Terri P McVeigh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJC reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melody G RedmanYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK. melody.redman@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-3188
Vernie AgudaCentre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Rhys DoreRoyal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1BB, UK.
Jen O LimDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QP, UK.
Beverley SpeightEast Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 134, Level 6, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Terri P McVeighCancer Genetics Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic changed the delivery of healthcare within the United Kingdom. A virtual model of care, utilising telephone and video consultations, was rapidly imposed upon cancer genetics teams. This large-scale change in service delivery has led to new opportunities that can be harnessed to improve patient care. There is a clear potential to mitigate geographical barriers, meet increasing patient expectations of implementing virtual consultations, reduce hospital carbon footprints, and decrease hospital costs while increasing efficiency. However, there are also significant challenges introduced by this model of care. Virtual healthcare consultations introduce another new level of digital exclusion for patients and clinicians. There are also potential challenges for maintaining patient confidentiality, and limited utility in circumstances where a physical exam may be warranted. For clinicians, there may be impacts on empathetic responses delivered and challenges in workflow and workload. Virtual consultations are likely to continue being a feature of cancer genetics services. A flexible approach is needed to allow for virtual and traditional models of care to work together and best meet patients' needs. Cancer genetics services should harness the opportunities provided by virtual processes to improve patient care, whilst collaborating with patient groups and other stakeholders to carefully examine and address the challenges that virtual consultations introduce.

Identifiers

PMID39516552
PMCPMC11524059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.