ArticleScientific reports2024
Evaluation of a real-time optoelectronic method for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer in patients with different transformation zone types.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- [TruScreen Combined With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing vs Thinprep Cytology Test Combined With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Comparative Clinical Study].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
- Effect of vaccination against HPV in the HPV-positive patients not covered by primary prevention on the disappearance of infection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of TruScreen, a real-time diagnostic technology, for cervical lesions in patients with different transformation zone (TZ) types. A total of 1908 women aged 34.0 ± 7.3 years who have received cytology, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, TruScreen, and colposcopy were recruited. The clinical performances of these tests were evaluated for their detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), or more severe lesions in patients with different TZ types. For the detection of HSIL, AIS, or more severe lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of TruScreen were 65.08%, 64.76%,11.55%, and 96.33%, respectively, which were similar to cytology (all P values > 0.05). For the detection of HSIL + in patients with type 3 TZ, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of TruScreen were 72.29%, 67.59%, 13.86%, and 97.13%, respectively, which were significantly higher than the sensitivity (51.16%, P = 0.029), specificity (59.59%, P = 0.001), PPV (7.94%, P = 0.016), and NPV (94.71%, P = 0.049) in type 1 and type 2 TZs. TruScreen has detection accuracy comparable to cytology and performs even better in patients with type 3 TZ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.