Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516501›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Comparison of measurements obtained with TOF-Cuff placed on the arm and the TOF-Scan on the adductor pollicis muscle during general anaesthesia using mivacurium: a prospective observational clinical trial.

Paweł Radkowski, Jakub Ruść, Mariusz Kęska

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Muscle-Specific Differences in Neuromuscular Block and Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  3. Advances in Neuromuscular Monitoring Techniques in Anesthesiology: A 2025 Perspective.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paweł RadkowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland. drpawelradkowski@gmail.com.
Jakub RuśćDepartment of Human Physiology and Patophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Mariusz KęskaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate neuromuscular monitoring of patients is essential to verify complete recovery of neuromuscular function before tracheal extubation. This study aimed to assess the correlation between the values acquired from the brachialis muscle using TOF-Cuff and those obtained from the adductor pollicis muscle with TOF-Scan during anaesthesia with mivacurium. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the observational clinical trial, with the TOF-Cuff positioned on the upper arm and the TOF-Scan on the thumb. Train-of-four (TOF) values were simultaneously recorded by both devices at 30-second intervals before intubation. Subsequently, measurements were taken every 5 min until the removal of the endotracheal tube. Bland-Altman analyses were conducted to compare assessed endpoints obtained by using the TOF-Cuff and the TOF-Scan. The median onset time measured with TOF-Cuff was numerically longer compared to the TOF-Scan score (120 s vs. 90 s, P = 0.42). Spearman rank correlation revealed a significant positive correlation between onset times measured by TOF-Cuff and TOF-Scan (R = 0.73, P = 0.0001, 95% CI 0.446 to 0.875). For the time to recovery assessed with both methods, Spearman correlation coefficient was R = 0.35 and did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.1). Multiplying the time to recovery from the last dose (according to TOF-Scan) by 0.43 to 2.66, provided concordance with the TOF-Cuff result for the entire range of study group. Conclusion. The concordance between the TOF-Scan on the adductor pollicis and the TOF-Cuff on the upper limb was found to be good. However, both devices showed a false-negative result in patients with clinical symptoms of preterm recovery.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralMivacuriumNeuromuscular MonitoringAdultAgedArmFemaleHumansIsoquinolinesMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsProspective StudiesIsoquinolinesMivacuriumNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID39516501
PMCPMC11549096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.