Observational studyScientific reports2024
Comparison of measurements obtained with TOF-Cuff placed on the arm and the TOF-Scan on the adductor pollicis muscle during general anaesthesia using mivacurium: a prospective observational clinical trial.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring in General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review of Recovery and Safety Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- Muscle-Specific Differences in Neuromuscular Block and Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Advances in Neuromuscular Monitoring Techniques in Anesthesiology: A 2025 Perspective.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Comparison of TOF scan neuromuscular monitoring on adductor pollicis vs. corrugator supercilii and flexor hallucis brevis.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Neuromuscular Blocking Agents and Reversal Agents Usage, and Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit - Review Article.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adequate neuromuscular monitoring of patients is essential to verify complete recovery of neuromuscular function before tracheal extubation. This study aimed to assess the correlation between the values acquired from the brachialis muscle using TOF-Cuff and those obtained from the adductor pollicis muscle with TOF-Scan during anaesthesia with mivacurium. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the observational clinical trial, with the TOF-Cuff positioned on the upper arm and the TOF-Scan on the thumb. Train-of-four (TOF) values were simultaneously recorded by both devices at 30-second intervals before intubation. Subsequently, measurements were taken every 5 min until the removal of the endotracheal tube. Bland-Altman analyses were conducted to compare assessed endpoints obtained by using the TOF-Cuff and the TOF-Scan. The median onset time measured with TOF-Cuff was numerically longer compared to the TOF-Scan score (120 s vs. 90 s, P = 0.42). Spearman rank correlation revealed a significant positive correlation between onset times measured by TOF-Cuff and TOF-Scan (R = 0.73, P = 0.0001, 95% CI 0.446 to 0.875). For the time to recovery assessed with both methods, Spearman correlation coefficient was R = 0.35 and did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.1). Multiplying the time to recovery from the last dose (according to TOF-Scan) by 0.43 to 2.66, provided concordance with the TOF-Cuff result for the entire range of study group. Conclusion. The concordance between the TOF-Scan on the adductor pollicis and the TOF-Cuff on the upper limb was found to be good. However, both devices showed a false-negative result in patients with clinical symptoms of preterm recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.