ArticleScientific reports2024
Sequestration of gene products by decoys enhances precision in the timing of intracellular events.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Expressed gene products often interact ubiquitously with binding sites at nucleic acids and macromolecular complexes, known as decoys. The binding of transcription factors (TFs) to decoys can be crucial in controlling the stochastic dynamics of gene expression. Here, we explore the impact of decoys on the timing of intracellular events, as captured by the time taken for the levels of a given TF to reach a critical threshold level, known as the first passage time (FPT). Although nonlinearity introduced by binding makes exact mathematical analysis challenging, employing suitable approximations and reformulating FPT in terms of an alternative variable, we analytically assess the impact of decoys. The stability of the decoy-bound TFs against degradation impacts FPT statistics crucially. Decoys reduce noise in FPT, and stable decoy-bound TFs offer greater timing precision with less expression cost than their unstable counterparts. Interestingly, when both bound and free TFs decay at the same rate, decoy binding does not directly alter FPT noise. We verify these results by performing exact stochastic simulations. These results have important implications for the precise temporal scheduling of events involved in the functioning of biomolecular clocks, development processes, cell-cycle control, and cell-size homeostasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.