ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Double-Layer Cogged Thread Lifting Technique: A Superficial- and Deep-Layer Lifting Method.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Group standardization of Chinese experts specification of operating techniques for facial embedded thread lift.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough thread lifting is a widely performed method, the degree of initial lifting and sustainability varies based on how the threads are inserted into the skin layers. This study aimed to perform thread lifting on 43 patients to achieve maximum lifting effects using thicker threads in the deeper layers of the subcutaneous fat layer and thinner threads in the shallower layers.
methodsImmediately after the procedure, we measured the depth of the inserted threads using ultrasonography and evaluated the results based on patient satisfaction and the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS). At the end of the procedure, an upright position was employed to check for dimples or irregularities, and intraoral observation was also conducted.
resultsPatient satisfaction significantly increased immediately after the procedure compared to that before the procedure. High GAIS scores were maintained even after 6 months, indicating high satisfaction with the procedure.
conclusionsInserting threads into multiple layers was deemed more effective than inserting them into a single layer. Thread lifting on 43 patients was used to maximize lifting effects by utilizing thicker threads in deeper subcutaneous fat layers and thinner threads in shallower ones. Our procedure maintained high global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) scores even after 6 months, indicating patient satisfaction. Multiple layers were shown to be more effective than a single layer for thread insertion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39516420What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.