Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516419›Full record

ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Ethnic Rhinoplasty in the Brazilian Population: Current Concepts.

Luiz Carlos Ishida, Yves Saban, Oona Tomiê Daronch, Rolf Gemperli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luiz Carlos IshidaPlastic Surgery Division, University of São Paulo (USP-SP), Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Yves SabanPlastic Surgery Division, University of São Paulo (USP-SP), Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.
Oona Tomiê DaronchPlastic Surgery Division, University of São Paulo (USP-SP), Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil. oona.daronch@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0001-8589-7088
Rolf GemperliPlastic Surgery Division, University of São Paulo (USP-SP), Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, São Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe large mixture of races in Brazil gives the nose its distinctive composition, which makes rhinoplasty difficult for these patients. Every patient should have their anatomy thoroughly examined on an individual basis, as there is no unique strategy that works for all situations. METHODOLOGY: This is a narrative overview of the last 10 years' worth of literature that describes the ethnic traits of each nose, with a particular emphasis on the Brazilian nose, and talks about the major surgical approaches that can be applied in these situations.

resultsThe low dorsum, broad nasal bones, thick skin, and bulbous tip are the primary features of the Brazilian nose. Many times, lateral osteotomies, root grafting, isotretinoin treatment for skin thickness, and neodomus formation are required.

conclusionThe Brazilian nose presents a surgical challenge that calls for the mastery of multiple procedures, not simply structured rhinoplasty. In certain cases, preservation rhinoplasty may even be used. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

EthnicityNoseRhinoplastyBrazilEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleEthnic rhinoplastyPreservation rhinoplastyRhinoplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.