ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Comparison of different histomorphological grading systems in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Severe fetomaternal transfusion due to an unrecognized chorangioma in a dichorionic, diamniotic twin pregnancy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Tumor Budding and Poorly Defined Clusters as Histological Biomarkers in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Vulva.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHistopathological biomarkers of carcinomas and their prognostic relevance, such as Broder's grading system (based on the total number of undifferentiated cells) or Bryne's grading system (rating morphological features at the tumor invasive front), have been repeatedly and successfully put to test. Since most studies focus on head and neck cancers or oral carcinomas, for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, no standardized and agreed on pathological tumor grading system, yielding prognostic significance, could be determined so far. MATERIAL AND
methodsTo determine prognostic associations of different grading systems with regard to groin lymph node metastasis, 73 cases of vulvar carcinomas (VC) were re-examined within our study and Broder's and Bryne's grading system individually performed. To sub-classify between HPV-associated or HPV-independent VC, immunohistochemical p16 stainings were performed. Statistical relationships were evaluated using Spearman correlation and logistic regression analysis, validation was achieved by employment of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) and assessment of ROC curves/AUC values.
resultsWithin our cohort, Broder's grade I (40≈55%) and Bryne's grade II (48≈66%) were the most frequently assigned histological gradings. We determined a positive correlation of Bryne's grading with the extent of lymph node involvement in HPV-associated tumors and demonstrated the feasibility of Bryne's grading to predict the presence of carcinoma cells within groin lymph nodes (LRT p = 0.0066; AUC value≈0.91) in this cohort. On the other hand, our data suggest that especially HPV-independent tumors may not sufficiently be characterized by current standardly performed grading approaches.
conclusionSince only Bryne's grading system correlated positively with lymph node involvement in HPV-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, we propose to include it by name next to the distinct tumor entity on the histopathological report, allowing not only the interpretation of its prognostic relevance but also future research attempts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39516411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.