ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Choice between DNA primer sets (A or B) of the ForenSeq kit: forensic evaluation in a Mexican admixed population sample.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forensic characterization of the 94 identity-informative SNPs included in the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit in a Mexican population sample.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Performance of the ForenSeqGenes · 2026Article
- Review
- Genetic Diversity and Forensic Parameters of 27 Y-STRs in Two Mestizo Populations from Western Mexico.Genes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) overcomes many PCR-CE limitations to analyze STRs and allow simultaneous inclusion of SNPs in forensic cases. By MPS, the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit analyzes 27 aSTRs, 7 X-STRs, 24Y-STRs, and 94 identity-informative SNPs (iiSNPs) with the DNA Primer Set-A (DPS-A). Optionally, the DNA Primer Set-B (DPS-B) adds to the analysis 56 ancestry-informative SNPs (aiSNPs) and 24 phenotype-informative SNPs (piSNPs), but diminishes from 96 to 32 the number of samples per sequencing run. We assessed the forensic informativity provided by the loci analyzed by these two DPS in admixed individuals from Mexico City (Center, Mexico). For STRs, we report length-based (LB) and sequence-based (SB) allele frequencies and forensic parameters of the 152 identity informative markers (DPS-A). For aSTRs, the combined PD of SB genotypes (PD ~ 100%) was ~ 2949 times larger than that from LB. Conversely, the observed phenotype distribution offered low PD levels (PD = 6.6% and 10.4%), whereas piSNPs predicted accurately only the modal brown eye and dark hair colors, respectively. Similarly, aiSNPs detected a large prevalence of admixed individuals (97.3%; PD = 5.4%). Although few individuals were inferred as Europeans and Native Americans (1.37% each), they were self-declared as admixed, which result confusing for HID purposes. In brief, SB genotypes increased significantly the informativity of STRs to solve complex cases (DPS-A), whereas aiSNPs and piSNPs added mostly irrelevant information (DPS-B). We provide useful cost-benefit criteria in one Latin American population to choose DPS-A (96 samples) instead of DPS-B (32 samples) of the Forenseq kit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39516400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.