ArticleBJC reports2024
Therapeutic vulnerabilities and pan-cancer landscape of BRAF class III mutations in epithelial solid tumors.
Article in BJC reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A first-in-human phase 1 study of the SHP2 inhibitor BBP-398 in patients with advanced solid tumors.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Plasma cell leukemia: genomic features and their potential relevance for exploring clinical actionability.Blood advances · 2026Article
- BRAF Targeting Across Solid Tumors: Molecular Aspects and Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKinase-impaired class III BRAF mutations have recently received attention as a possible prognostic factor and therapeutic target. Class III BRAF variants differ from class I and class II mutations in terms of mechanism of pathway activation and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Genomic landscape analyses of tumors in large real-world cohorts represent a great opportunity to further characterize tumor-related molecular events and treatment vulnerabilities, however, such data is not yet available for tumors with BRAF class III mutations.
methodsWe investigated the pan-cancer genomic landscape of BRAF class III mutations in 376,302 patients. Patients had comprehensive genomic profiling either by FoundationOne® or FoundationOne®CDx from formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissue biopsies. 2 patient cases that harbored BRAF class III mutations who demonstrated dramatic response to anti-EGFR treatment were presented.
resultsBRAF class III mutations are likely to co-occur with RAF1, NRAS and HRAS alterations, while concomitant KRAS alterations were rare. Moreover, we found that alterations that predict resistance to anti-EGFR agents were significantly less common in tumors harboring BRAF class III mutations, which is of great importance as anti-EGFR therapies are a potential targeted treatment option in these tumors. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest a heterogenous interplay of oncogenic alterations in BRAF class III mutated tumors and have important implications for the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis while revealing potential therapeutic vulnerabilities. HIGHLIGHTS: Tumors harboring BRAF class III (BRAF vIII) mutations comprise a novel subset with distinct genomic heterogeneity. BRAF vIII mutations may sensitize tumors to anti-EGFR treatments. BRAF vIII alterations show significantly less co-occurrence with alterations that predict resistance to anti-EGFR agents. Rare tumors with limited therapy options should be screened for BRAF vIII mutations as they may benefit from anti-EGFR agents.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.