Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516356›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular immunology2024

Targeting of TAMs: can we be more clever than cancer cells?

Julia Kzhyshkowska, Jiaxin Shen, Irina Larionova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DONSON links tumor-cell survival to MIF-associated macrophage remodeling in small cell lung cancer.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. NLRC5-Deficient Macrophages Promote a Tumor-Permissive Phenotype via AXL- and MERTK-Mediated Efferocytosis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. CD74Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia KzhyshkowskaDepartment of Innate Immunity and Tolerance, Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Mannheim Institute for Innate Immunoscience (MI3), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer, 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. julia.kzhyshkowska@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.
Jiaxin ShenDepartment of Innate Immunity and Tolerance, Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, Mannheim Institute for Innate Immunoscience (MI3), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer, 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-8466
Irina LarionovaLaboratory of Translational Cellular and Molecular Biomedicine, National Research Tomsk State University, 634050, Lenina av.36, Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5758-7330

Funding

China Scholarship Council (CSC) 202306320511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

АBSTRACT: With increasing incidence and geography, cancer is one of the leading causes of death, reduced quality of life and disability worldwide. Principal progress in the development of new anticancer therapies, in improving the efficiency of immunotherapeutic tools, and in the personification of conventional therapies needs to consider cancer-specific and patient-specific programming of innate immunity. Intratumoral TAMs and their precursors, resident macrophages and monocytes, are principal regulators of tumor progression and therapy resistance. Our review summarizes the accumulated evidence for the subpopulations of TAMs and their increasing number of biomarkers, indicating their predictive value for the clinical parameters of carcinogenesis and therapy resistance, with a focus on solid cancers of non-infectious etiology. We present the state-of-the-art knowledge about the tumor-supporting functions of TAMs at all stages of tumor progression and highlight biomarkers, recently identified by single-cell and spatial analytical methods, that discriminate between tumor-promoting and tumor-inhibiting TAMs, where both subtypes express a combination of prototype M1 and M2 genes. Our review focuses on novel mechanisms involved in the crosstalk among epigenetic, signaling, transcriptional and metabolic pathways in TAMs. Particular attention has been given to the recently identified link between cancer cell metabolism and the epigenetic programming of TAMs by histone lactylation, which can be responsible for the unlimited protumoral programming of TAMs. Finally, we explain how TAMs interfere with currently used anticancer therapeutics and summarize the most advanced data from clinical trials, which we divide into four categories: inhibition of TAM survival and differentiation, inhibition of monocyte/TAM recruitment into tumors, functional reprogramming of TAMs, and genetic enhancement of macrophages.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorEpigenesis, GeneticHumansMacrophagesTumor-Associated MacrophagesTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorAngiogenesisCytokineEpigeneticGrowth factorImmunotherapyMetabolismScavenger receptor

Identifiers

PMID39516356
PMCPMC11607358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.