ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Effect of enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses on glaucoma patients' foveal threshold.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of an Isofocal Optic-Design Intraocular Lens with Double C-Loop Haptics in Eyes with Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Contrast Sensitivity After Combined MIGS and Cataract Surgery: A Comparison of Monofocal and Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Visual outcomes in patients with bilateral early to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma following wavefront-shaping partial-range of field-extend intraocular lens implantation.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Postoperative Satisfaction After Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Premium Intraocular Lenses and Their Impact on Visual Field Assessment: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of the enhanced monofocal intraocular lens in glaucoma of varying severity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe investigated the effect of enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOL) (TECNIS Eyhance DIB00V) on retinal sensitivity in glaucoma patients after cataract surgery by comparing results with of such patients implanted with non-enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (TECNIS ZCB00V). PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a multi-facility retrospective study of glaucoma patients who had undergone cataract surgery. We measured the value of the foveal threshold with a Humphrey visual field analyzer before and after cataract surgery and considered this value to represent the sensitivity of the retina. As a sub-analysis, we also compared the mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), thickness of ganglion cell complex (GCC), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after surgery. We used t-tests to determine statistical differences between lens groups.
resultsWe included 60 glaucoma patients (104 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery: enhanced group, n = 58 eyes; non-enhanced group, n = 46 eyes. In both groups, cataract surgery improved the retinal sensitivity (p < 0.001), MD (p < 0.001) and BCVA (p < 0.001). The postoperative foveal thresholds did not significantly differ by lens type (p = 0.673), at 34.41 ± 2.44 dB in the enhanced group and 34.61 ± 2.19 dB in the non-enhanced group. Likewise, there was no significant difference (p = 0.942) among advanced glaucoma patients, with postoperative foveal thresholds of 33.08 ± 2.35 dB and 33.17 ± 3.45 dB in the enhanced and non-enhanced, respectively.
conclusionsImplantation of enhanced monofocal IOLs in glaucoma patients did not result in any apparent loss of sensitivity compared with non-enhanced monofocal lens implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39516329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.