Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516307›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2024

Current management status of cleaning and disinfection for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis.

Ruixue Hu, Liangying Yi, Tianle Zou, Juan Hu, Yanhua Chen, Wei Pan

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruixue HuDepartment of Sterile processing Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Liangying YiDepartment of Sterile processing Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. yiliangying88@163.com.
Tianle ZouCollege of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, 1 Jinji Rd, Qixing District, Guilin, China.
Juan HuDepartment of Sterile processing Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yanhua ChenDepartment of Sterile processing Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wei PanDepartment of Sterile processing Nursing, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

West China Second University Hospital No. HLBKJ202103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the current status of cleaning and disinfection management for digestive endoscopy, provide data for standardization processing techniques, and improve the quality of cleaning and disinfection. Methods Two reviewers independently and comprehensively searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and CBM databases on February 1, 2023. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were strictly followed during the literature survey and data extraction. All observational studies detailing the current cleaning and disinfection management status for digestive endoscopy in hospitals were included. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 software. Results After removing different articles, the meta-analysis finally included 54 articles associated with multiple countries. The authors favor auditing staffers to confirm compliance with guidelines. The meta-analysis results indicated a configuration rate of 76% (95% CI: 68-83%) for separate rooms designated for reprocessing; 79% (95% CI: 72-84%) for reprocessing rooms with adequate ventilation; 30% (95% CI: 24-36%) for automated endoscope washer-disinfectors; 68% (95% CI: 55-81%) for complete protective equipment usage; 90% (95% CI: 83-95%) for the configuration rate of endoscope and accessory storage cabinets; 50% (95% CI: 38-61%) for changing enzymatic-type detergents after each use; 51% (95% CI: 30-71%) for the use of purified or sterilized water for final rinsing; 80% (95% CI: 70-88%) for monitoring disinfectant concentration; 87% (95% CI: 80-93%) for microbial monitoring; and 44% (95% CI: 26-62%) for the usage of protective equipment. Conclusion The configuration of the automated endoscope washer-disinfector, non-standard cleaning and disinfection procedures, and a lack of occupational protection awareness among personnel responsible for cleaning and disinfecting digestive endoscopy were all apparent issues. It was suggested that all departments enhance their levels of management and supervision, standardize reprocessing procedures and quality control details, upgrade hardware facilities and spatial layouts, reinforce personnel training, and increase staff awareness of nosocomial infection risks.

Indexed as

DisinfectionEndoscopy, GastrointestinalCross InfectionDisinfectantsHumansInfection ControlDisinfectantsCleaning and disinfectionDigestive endoscopyManagementMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID39516307
PMCPMC11549413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.