ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024
A novel ionic liquid-based approach for DNA and RNA extraction simplifies sample preparation for bacterial diagnostics.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A high-yield, SPE-free DNA extraction method using a pyridinium-based ionic liquid compatible with downstream PCR analysis.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A rapid ionic liquid-based DNA extraction method for molecular diagnostics of urinary tract infections.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- DNA sandwich nanozyme-based colorimetric and photothermal biosensor for high-efficiency detection of fusion genes.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A Concise Review of the Control and Assessment of Magnetic Affinity Particle Assembly for Live Cell Analyses: State of the Art and Challenges.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA- and RNA-based diagnostics play a pivotal role in accurately detecting and characterizing health-relevant bacteria, offering insights into bacterial presence, viability and treatment efficacy. Herein, we present the development of a novel extraction protocol for both DNA and RNA, designed to enable simple and rapid molecular diagnostics. The extraction method is based on the hydrophilic ionic liquid (IL) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate and silica-coated magnetic beads. First, we developed an IL-based cell lysis protocol for bacteria that operates at room temperature. Subsequently, we established a magnetic bead purification procedure to efficiently and reproducibly extract DNA and RNA from the IL-lysates. The IL not only lyses the cells, but also facilitates the adsorption of nucleic acids (NAs) onto the surface of the magnetic beads, eliminating the need for a chaotropic binding buffer and allowing for purification of NAs without significant effort and materials required. Lastly, we combined the cell lysis step and the purification step and evaluated the novel IL-based extraction method on periopathogenic bacterial cultures, comparing it to commercial DNA and RNA extraction kits via (RT)-qPCR. In comparison to the reference methods, the IL-based extraction protocol yielded similar or superior results. Furthermore, costs are lower, required materials and equipment are minimal and the process is fast (30 min), simple and automatable. These characteristics favour the developed method for use in routine and high-throughput testing as well as in point-of-care, on-site and low-resource settings, thereby advancing the field of molecular diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.