Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516251›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative analysis of the postadmission and antemortem oropharyngeal and rectal swab microbiota of ICU patients.

Annamaria Petrilla, Peter Nemeth, Peter Fauszt, Anna Szilagyi-Racz, Maja Mikolas, Emese Szilagyi-Tolnai, Peter David, Aniko Stagel, Ferenc Gal, Kristof Gal and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Annamaria Petrilla *Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vas County Markusovszky Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary.
Peter Nemeth *Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Vas County Markusovszky Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary.
Peter FausztFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Complex Systems and Microbiome-innovations Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Anna Szilagyi-RaczFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Complex Systems and Microbiome-innovations Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Maja MikolasFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Complex Systems and Microbiome-innovations Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Emese Szilagyi-TolnaiFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Complex Systems and Microbiome-innovations Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Peter DavidFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Complex Systems and Microbiome-innovations Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Aniko StagelHungarian National Blood Transfusion Service Nucleic Acid Testing Laboratory, Budapest, Hungary.
Ferenc GalFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Complex Systems and Microbiome-innovations Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Kristof GalDepartment of Oncoradiology, University of Debrecen Clinical Centre, Debrecen, Hungary.
Reka SohajdaHungarian National Blood Transfusion Service Nucleic Acid Testing Laboratory, Budapest, Hungary.
Trinh PhamTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Abo Akademi University, 20520, Turku, Finland.
Laszlo StundlFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Sandor BiroDepartment of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Judit RemenyikFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Complex Systems and Microbiome-innovations Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Melinda PaholcsekFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, Complex Systems and Microbiome-innovations Centre, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. paholcsek.melinda@agr.unideb.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shotgun metabarcoding was conducted to examine the microbiota in a total of 48 samples from 12 critically ill patients, analyzing samples from both the oropharynx and rectum. We aimed to compare their postadmission microbiota, characterized as moderately dysbiotic, with the severely dysbiotic antemortem microbiota associated with patients' deaths. We found that, compared with postadmission samples, patient antemortem swab samples presented moderate but not significantly decreased diversity indices. The antemortem oropharyngeal samples presented an increase in biofilm-forming bacteria, including Streptococcus oralis, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Enterococcus faecalis. Although the septic shock rate was 67%, no significant differences were detected in the potential pathogen ratios when the microbiota was analyzed. A notable strain-sharing rate between the oropharynx and intestine was noted. By comparing postadmission and antemortem samples, microbial biomarkers of severe dysbiosis were pinpointed through the analysis of differentially abundant and uniquely emerging species in both oropharyngeal and rectal swabs. Demonstrating strong interconnectivity along the oral-intestinal axis, these biomarkers could serve as indicators of the progression of dysbiosis. Furthermore, the microbial networks of the oropharyngeal microbiota in deceased patients presented the lowest modularity, suggesting a vulnerable community structure. Our data also highlight the critical importance of introducing treatments aimed at enhancing the resilience of the oral cavity microbiome, thereby contributing to better patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMicrobiotaOropharynxRectumAdultAgedBacteriaCritical IllnessDysbiosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39516251
PMCPMC11549221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.