Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516204›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Cell shape affects bacterial colony growth under physical confinement.

M Sreepadmanabh, Meenakshi Ganesh, Pratibha Sanjenbam, Christina Kurzthaler, Deepa Agashe, Tapomoy Bhattacharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Optimal disk packing of chloroplasts in plant cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Dissecting the physics of bacterial biofilms with agent-based simulations.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M SreepadmanabhNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3492-0203
Meenakshi GaneshNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India.
Pratibha SanjenbamNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India.
Christina KurzthalerMax Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany.
Deepa AgasheNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0374-8159
Tapomoy BhattacharjeeNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore, India. tapa@ncbs.res.in.ORCID 0000-0001-8899-1379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence from homogeneous liquid or flat-plate cultures indicates that biochemical cues are the primary modes of bacterial interaction with their microenvironment. However, these systems fail to capture the effect of physical confinement on bacteria in their natural habitats. Bacterial niches like the pores of soil, mucus, and infected tissues are disordered microenvironments with material properties defined by their internal pore sizes and shear moduli. Here, we use three-dimensional matrices that match the viscoelastic properties of gut mucus to test how altering the physical properties of their microenvironment influences the growth of bacteria under confinement. We find that low aspect ratio (spherical) bacteria form compact, spherical colonies under confinement while high aspect ratio (rod-shaped) bacteria push their progenies further outwards to create elongated colonies with a higher surface area, enabling increased access to nutrients. As a result, the population growth of high aspect ratio bacteria is, under the tested conditions, more robust to increased physical confinement compared to that of low aspect ratio bacteria. Thus, our experimental evidence supports that environmental physical constraints can play a selective role in bacterial growth based on cell shape.

Indexed as

BacteriaCell ShapeEscherichia coli

Identifiers

PMID39516204
PMCPMC11549454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.