Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39515999›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2024

Patient-reported outcomes after treatment for rectal cancer-A prospective nationwide study.

Kathinka Schmidt Slørdahl, Aina Balto, Marianne Grønlie Guren, Arne Wibe, Hartwig Kørner, Stig Norderval, Ylva Maria Gjelsvik, Tor Åge Myklebust, Inger Kristin Larsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient-reported outcomes after treatment for rectal cancer-A prospective nationwide study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kathinka Schmidt SlørdahlInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Aina BaltoDepartment of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Marianne Grønlie GurenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Arne WibeInstitute of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Hartwig KørnerDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Stig NordervalDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6171-7425
Ylva Maria GjelsvikDepartment of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Tor Åge MyklebustDepartment of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Inger Kristin LarsenDepartment of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-5324

Funding

Norwegian Society of Cancer 201908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWhile modern treatment has improved rectal cancer (RC) survival, it can cause late side effects that impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to evaluate HRQoL and late effects 1 year after diagnosis in patients who underwent major resection for Stage I-III RC.

methodAll patients with RC registered in the Cancer Registry of Norway between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020, aged ≥ 18 years, and a control group without colorectal cancer were invited to participate in the study by answering a questionnaire on HRQoL and late effects. Functional domains and symptoms were compared in different patient groups and between patients and controls.

resultsThere were 558 patients and 1693 controls eligible for analysis. Response rates were 41% for patients and 23% for controls. Some differences in HRQoL were observed between treatment modalities. Major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) was prevalent in 60.8% of patients, and was associated with lower functional and higher symptom scores compared with patients with no/minor LARS. Patients with major chronic pain [n = 86 (15.4%)] had significantly lower scores for most of the functional items and higher symptom scores than patients with no/minor chronic pain. Patients had some lower functional scores and several higher symptoms score compared with controls.

conclusionPatients who suffered from major LARS or major chronic pain had significantly impaired functions and more symptoms beyond change in bowel function and pain, respectively. Identification and treatment of these patient may hopefully be beneficial for their HRQoL.

Indexed as

chronic painhealth related quality of lifelate side effectslow anterior resection syndromepatient reported outcome measuresrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID39515999
PMCPMC11683195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.