Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39515866›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Exploring accessibility, user experience and engagement of digital media among older patients with depression: a pilot and observational screening study protocol of the DiGA4Aged study.

Chantal Giehl, Magdalini Chatsatrian, Horst Christian Vollmar, Theresa Sophie Busse, Jennifer Bosompem, Peter Rasche, Jan Dieris-Hirche, Magdalena Pape, Georg Juckel, Ida Haussleiter and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chantal Giehl *Department of Geriatric Medicine, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany Chantal.Giehl@elisabethgruppe.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3771-1394
Magdalini Chatsatrian *Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine (AM RUB), Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1545-5411
Horst Christian VollmarInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine (AM RUB), Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0117-7188
Theresa Sophie BusseInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine (AM RUB), Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1821-749X
Jennifer BosompemInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine (AM RUB), Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1349-9635
Peter RascheDepartment of Healthcare, Niederrhein University of Applied Sciences, Krefeld, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7974-8668
Jan Dieris-HircheDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0277-6895
Magdalena PapeDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LWL University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1952-8625
Georg JuckelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LWL University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ida HaussleiterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LWL University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0198-0480
Nina TimmesfeldDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Anna MaiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Rainer WirthDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Ina Carola OtteInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine (AM RUB), Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-0899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prevalence of mental health problems is increasing worldwide, particularly in the vulnerable group of older people. The limited availability of therapists, long wait periods and increasing shortage of healthcare resources limit adequate care. As a result, digital applications are becoming more commonplace as an alternative to human therapists. However, these tend to be used by younger people with higher education, digital health literacy and experience. In Germany, applications that are approved by the health authorities, so-called digital health applications (DiGAs), can be prescribed by physicians and psychotherapists. It remains unclear to the extent older people are experienced with, are willing and can use a DiGA. Therefore, this research aims to identify specific challenges of older people's accessibility, user experience and engagement with DiGA for depressive disorders. The DiGA4Aged project consists of: (1) a pilot study on usability, (2) a screening study on potential participants for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the digital experience of the target population and (3) an RCT to test the effectiveness of a digital nurse as individualised user support in the intervention group. This paper focuses on the pilot study and the screening study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The instrumental components in preparing for the RCT are a mixed-method pilot and observational quantitative screening study, which are described in this manuscript. The pilot study includes questionnaires (covering sociodemographic data, user experience, health literacy, electronic health literacy, media affinity, severity of depression and perceived usability of DiGA), a concurrent think aloud method and a semistructured interview to evaluate two applications with regard to their usability for, acceptance by and needs of older people. The observational screening study collects data of older patients consecutively admitted to an acute care geriatric hospital ward using various questionnaires to identify which clinical and medical factors are associated with the access to, experience with and (non-)use of digital media. Data from the comprehensive geriatric assessment is collected as well as data on their digital media experience and digital health literacy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The overall project DiGA4Aged received ethical approval on 17 November 2023 from the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of Ruhr-University Bochum (registration number 23-7901). Results will be disseminated within the scientific community via publication in peer-reviewed journals as well as presentation at national conferences. The findings from the pilot study and the observational screening study will determine the selection of the DiGA and the recruitment strategy for the subsequent RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: The pilot study has been prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00033640, registered on 18 March 2024, available from https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00033640). Likewise, the observational screening study has been prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00032931, registered on 29 November 2023, available from https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00032931).

Indexed as

DepressionAgedFemaleGermanyHealth LiteracyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleObservational Studies as TopicPilot Projectsageddepression & mood disordershealth services accessibilityself-help devicessurveys and questionnairestask performance and analysis

Identifiers

PMID39515866
PMCPMC11552568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.