ArticleBMJ open2024
'This is PEEP' participatory qualitative study: learning from a provincial consultation and advisory group of people with lived and living experience of substance use in British Columbia, Canada.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo summarise PEEP's (Professionals for Ethical Engagement of Peers-a group of consultants with lived and living experience of substance use) outputs and gain insights into PEEP's impact and suggestions for the future.
designIncluded an environmental scan to collate PEEP activities and outputs and a participatory qualitative design using thematic analysis.
settingBritish Columbia, Canada.
participantsEight members of PEEP and nine staff/people who consulted PEEP were interviewed.
resultsPEEP members are co-authors/acknowledged for their input in 25 peer review publications and 16 reports; PEEP members co-presented or were co-authors on 33 presentations. PEEP meets by Zoom two times per week and is paid monthly via honorarium from the Provincial Health Service Authority at a current rate of $C30 per hour. Four themes emerged from our interviews: (1) What is PEEP? (PEEP provides a sense of community, holds systems accountable and inspires others), (2) PEEP Process (suggestions for improvement: consultants should be prepared and involve PEEP throughout the process and report how PEEP's insights were used), (3) PEEP Outcomes (PEEP members gain skills and confidence, PEEP provides a reality check, consultants learn from PEEP, and input leads to practice changes) and (4) Future of PEEP (sustainable funding and opportunities for growth are critical).
conclusionPEEP is a cohesive group whose input is well-respected and influences policy and programmes. Given the ongoing drug toxicity emergency, it is critical to continue to support and expand PEEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.