Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39515845›Full record

Trial reportBMJ mental health2024

Healthcare utilisation and costs associated with poor access to diagnosis and treatment for children and young people with tic disorders.

Charlotte L Hall, Marie Le Novere, Tara Murphy, Emma McNally, Christopher Hollis, Rachael Hunter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03483493 (Therapist-guided, Parent-assisted Remote Digital Behavioural Intervention for Tics in Children and Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03483493 nacompletednot on this map

Therapist-guided, Parent-assisted Remote Digital Behavioural Intervention for Tics in Children and Adolescents With Tourette Syndrome: an Internal Pilot Study and Single-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS TrustRan2018 to 2021Enrolled224ConditionsTic Disorders, Tourette SyndromeArmsExposure Response Prevention for tics, Psychoeducation for tics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Prevalence of Tic Disorders in Poland: Regional and Sex Differences.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Challenges in the treatment of Tourette syndrome in the Philippines.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlotte L HallNIHR MindTech MedTech Health Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5412-6165
Marie Le NovereResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK.
Tara MurphyUniversity College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Emma McNallyTourettes Action, Farnborough, UK.
Christopher HollisNIHR MindTech MedTech Health Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Rachael HunterResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK r.hunter@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no specific national guidelines in England to guide healthcare professionals in how to assess or treat young people with tic disorders. Access to evidence-based treatment, including behavioural therapy, is of limited availability.

objectivesThis study examined the economic impact on services arising from a lack of access to appropriate healthcare services for young people with tic disorders, alongside the impact on school attendance.

methodsThis study used data from the randomised controlled trial 'ORBIT' (Online Remote Behavioural Intervention for Tics). ORBIT compared online exposure and response prevention behavioural therapy for tics with online psychoeducation and recruited 224 young people aged 9-17 years in England. Here, we explore costs of health service use and school absenteeism from children who participated in the ORBIT trial and present these alongside the economic impact of including ORBIT within a tic service. We supplement ORBIT data with findings from two case studies.

findingsThe data showed that patients have care from several healthcare professionals and miss school due to accessing care for tics. The case studies suggest that most of these contacts with specialist services are unlikely to be supportive. However, adding ORBIT could save the National Health Service £1 million.

conclusionsYoung people with tic disorders are likely to engage in substantial use of healthcare resources because of inadequate care pathways. The availability of an evidence-based online therapy such as ORBIT could save money to the healthcare system. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There is a need to improve service provision and develop national guidelines for tic disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN70758207, NCT03483493.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityTic DisordersAbsenteeismAdolescentBehavior TherapyChildEnglandFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareChild & adolescent psychiatryPSYCHIATRY

Identifiers

PMID39515845
PMCPMC11552533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.