Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39515403›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2024

A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for fMRI time-series classification.

Pavel Popov, Usman Mahmood, Zening Fu, Carl Yang, Vince Calhoun, Sergey Plis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pavel PopovTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA. Electronic address: ppopov1@gsu.edu.
Usman MahmoodTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA.
Zening FuTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA.
Carl YangEmory University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA.
Vince CalhounTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA.
Sergey PlisTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Emory University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA; Georgia State University, Atlanta, 30303, GA, USA.

Funding

Data-driven solutions for temporal, spatial, and spatiotemporal dynamic functional connectivityR01MH123610 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
CRCNS: Multimodal Dynamic Causal Learning for NeuroimagingR01MH129047 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PLIS, SERGEY · 2021 to 2024
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123610NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current neuroimaging studies frequently use complex machine learning models to classify human fMRI data, distinguishing healthy and disordered brains, often to validate new methods or enhance prediction accuracy. Yet, where prediction accuracy is a concern, our results suggest that precision in prediction does not always require such sophistication. When a classifier as simple as logistic regression is applied to feature-engineered fMRI data, it can match or even outperform more sophisticated recent models. Classification of the raw time series fMRI data generally benefits from complex parameter-rich models. However, this complexity often pushes them into the class of black-box models. Yet, we found that a relatively simple model can consistently outperform much more complex classifiers in both accuracy and speed. This model applies the same multi-layer perceptron repeatedly across time and averages the results. Thus, the complexity and black-box nature of the parameter rich models, often perceived as a necessary trade-off for higher performance, do not invariably yield superior results on fMRI. Given the success of straightforward approaches, we challenge the merit of research that concentrates solely on complex model development driven by classification. Instead, we advocate for increased focus on designing models that prioritize the explainability of fMRI data or pursue applicable objectives beyond mere classification accuracy, unless they significantly outperform logistic regression or our proposed model. To validate our claim, we explore possible reasons for the superior performance of our straightforward model by examining the innate characteristics of fMRI time series data. Our findings suggest that the sequential information hidden in the temporal order may be far less important for the accurate fMRI classification than the stand-alone pieces of information scattered across the frames of the time series.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainBrain MappingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBrain disordersData explainabilityDeep learningMachine learningPredictive neuroimagingResting-state fMRI

Identifiers

PMID39515403
PMCPMC11625415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.