ArticleNeuroImage2024
A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for fMRI time-series classification.
Article in NeuroImage, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classifying schizophrenia patients and healthy individuals: Whole brain SPECT functional connectivity using support vector machine classification.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Benchmarking resting state fMRI connectivity pipelines for classification: robust accuracy despite processing variability in cross-site eye state prediction.Brain informatics · 2026Article
- Generating imperceptible adversarial examples via low-frequency aware transfer attacks on battery management systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable Self-Supervised Dynamic Neuroimaging Using Time Reversal.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current neuroimaging studies frequently use complex machine learning models to classify human fMRI data, distinguishing healthy and disordered brains, often to validate new methods or enhance prediction accuracy. Yet, where prediction accuracy is a concern, our results suggest that precision in prediction does not always require such sophistication. When a classifier as simple as logistic regression is applied to feature-engineered fMRI data, it can match or even outperform more sophisticated recent models. Classification of the raw time series fMRI data generally benefits from complex parameter-rich models. However, this complexity often pushes them into the class of black-box models. Yet, we found that a relatively simple model can consistently outperform much more complex classifiers in both accuracy and speed. This model applies the same multi-layer perceptron repeatedly across time and averages the results. Thus, the complexity and black-box nature of the parameter rich models, often perceived as a necessary trade-off for higher performance, do not invariably yield superior results on fMRI. Given the success of straightforward approaches, we challenge the merit of research that concentrates solely on complex model development driven by classification. Instead, we advocate for increased focus on designing models that prioritize the explainability of fMRI data or pursue applicable objectives beyond mere classification accuracy, unless they significantly outperform logistic regression or our proposed model. To validate our claim, we explore possible reasons for the superior performance of our straightforward model by examining the innate characteristics of fMRI time series data. Our findings suggest that the sequential information hidden in the temporal order may be far less important for the accurate fMRI classification than the stand-alone pieces of information scattered across the frames of the time series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.