ArticleScience advances2024
Spatially varying nanophotonic neural networks.
Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- How nanophotonics can drive optical computing toward practical applications.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
- Metaoptics merging computational optics and optical computing toward intelligent visual perception.Science advances · 2026Review
- The spatial complexity of optical computing: toward space-efficient design.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Photonic advantage of optical encoders.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The explosive growth in computation and energy cost of artificial intelligence has spurred interest in alternative computing modalities to conventional electronic processors. Photonic processors, which use photons instead of electrons, promise optical neural networks with ultralow latency and power consumption. However, existing optical neural networks, limited by their designs, have not achieved the recognition accuracy of modern electronic neural networks. In this work, we bridge this gap by embedding parallelized optical computation into flat camera optics that perform neural network computations during capture, before recording on the sensor. We leverage large kernels and propose a spatially varying convolutional network learned through a low-dimensional reparameterization. We instantiate this network inside the camera lens with a nanophotonic array with angle-dependent responses. Combined with a lightweight electronic back-end of about 2K parameters, our reconfigurable nanophotonic neural network achieves 72.76% accuracy on CIFAR-10, surpassing AlexNet (72.64%), and advancing optical neural networks into the deep learning era.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.