Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514654›Full record

ReviewScience advances2024

Contemporary small-scale subsistence populations offer unique insights into human musculoskeletal health and aging.

Jonathan Stieglitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jonathan StieglitzDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Toulouse School of Economics, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Université Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5985-9643

Funding

Testing Hypothesized Pathways Linking Infection, Physical Activity, Apoe Genotype, And Biological Sex To Low Dementia Prevalence And Reduced Brain Atrophy In Two Native American PopulationsR01AG054442 · NIA · CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY · PI CALEB E FINCH, Margaret Gatz · 2022 to 2026
$15.2M
Brain atrophy, cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's in low CVD-risk populationRF1AG054442 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI FINCH, CALEB E, GURVEN, MICHAEL DOUGLAS · 2017 to 2020
$8.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054442NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG054442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human foragers avoid noncommunicable diseases that are leading causes of mortality, partly because physically active lifestyles promote healthy aging. High activity levels also promote tissue damage accumulation from wear-and-tear, increase risk of injury and disability which compromise productivity, and reduce energetic investments in somatic maintenance given constrained energy expenditure. Constraints intensify when nutrient supply is limited and surplus energy is directed toward pathogen defense and reproduction, as occurred throughout hominin evolution. This paper reviews evidence linking exposomes to musculoskeletal health in subsistence populations, focusing on effects of physical activity, pathogens, diet, and reproduction. Chronic musculoskeletal conditions are common for humans and possibly prehistoric hominins but rarer in quadrupedal apes. We propose that transition to bipedalism ~6 to 8 million years ago constituted an early "mismatch scenario," increasing hominin susceptibility to musculoskeletal conditions vis-à-vis quadrupedal apes due to changes in mechanical loading environments. Mismatched musculoskeletal traits were not targets of selection because of trade-offs favoring bipedal extractive foraging and higher fertility.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBiological EvolutionExerciseHominidaeHumansMusculoskeletal Diseases

Identifiers

PMID39514654
PMCPMC11804946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.