Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514649›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025

Linking national primary care electronic health records to individual records from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey: evaluating the likelihood of linkage based on patient health.

Aubrey Limburg, Nicole Gladish, David H Rehkopf, Robert L Phillips, Victoria Udalova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aubrey LimburgU.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD 20746, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0437-913X
Nicole GladishDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6039-7001
David H RehkopfDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7597-6513
Robert L PhillipsAmerican Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY 40511, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7882-1560
Victoria UdalovaU.S. Census Bureau, Suitland, MD 20746, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-1439

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the likelihood of linking electronic health records (EHRs) to restricted individual-level American Community Survey (ACS) data based on patient health condition. MATERIALS AND

methodsElectronic health records (2019-2021) are derived from a primary care registry collected by the American Board of Family Medicine. These data were assigned anonymized person-level identifiers (Protected Identification Keys [PIKs]) at the U.S. Census Bureau. These records were then linked to restricted individual-level data from the ACS (2005-2022). We used logistic regressions to evaluate match rates for patients with health conditions across a range of severity: hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease.

resultsAmong more than 2.8 million patients, 99.2% were assigned person-level identifiers (PIKs). There were some differences in the odds of receiving an identifier in adjusted models for patients with hypertension (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.63, 1.77) and diabetes (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.22), relative to those without. There were only small differences in the odds of matching to ACS in adjusted models for patients with hypertension (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.04), diabetes (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03), and chronic kidney disease (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.06), relative to those without. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionOur work supports evidence-building across government consistent with the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 and the goal of leveraging data as a strategic asset. Given the high PIK and ACS match rates, with small differences based on health condition, our findings suggest the feasibility of enhancing the utility of EHR data for research focused on health.

Indexed as

CensusesElectronic Health RecordsMedical Record LinkagePrimary Health CareAdultAgedDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedRenal Insufficiency, ChronicUnited Statesdata linkageelectronic health recordshealth disparitiespopulation health

Identifiers

PMID39514649
PMCPMC11648727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.