Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514560›Full record

ReviewCarcinogenesis2024

Exogenous or in situ vaccination to trigger clinical responses in pancreatic cancer.

Gregory L Beatty, Elizabeth M Jaffee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Carcinogenesis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregory L BeattyAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, South Pavilion, Rm 8-107, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7165-5993
Elizabeth M JaffeeThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Bloomberg Kimmel Institute for Immunotherapy, The Cancer Convergence Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 4M07 Bunting Blaustein Cancer Research Building, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3841-6549

Funding

Transforming Human Pancreatic Cancer Into An Immunologic DiseaseP01CA247886 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERS, ROBERT A. · 2021 to 2025
$12.7M
Targeting the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment of Pancreatic Cancer with a Neoadjuvant Platform Clinical TrialR01CA197296 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI William Reece Burns, Eric Christenson · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
Targeting the liver for immunotherapy in pancreatic cancerR01CA197916 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Gregory L Beatty · 2016 to 2026
$3.7M
Mechanisms and therapeutic targets of cancer metastasisR01CA245323 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BEATTY, GREGORY L · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
AACR-The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research "Science of the Patient" 20-60-51-BEATDepartment of Defense W81XWH2110621Lustgarten Foundation Cancer Convergence Grant Stand Up To Cancer-Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Interception Translational Cancer Research SU2C-AACR-DT26-17NCI NIH HHS P01 CA247886NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197296NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197916NCI NIH HHS R01 CA245323NIH HHS R01-CA197916Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Precision Medicine Targeted 17-85-BEATStand Up To Cancer -Lustgarten Foundation 2015-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is a lethal disease for which remarkable therapeutic resistance is the norm. Conventional immunotherapies, like immune checkpoint inhibitors, show limited efficacy in PDA due to a remarkably immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and systemic inflammation. This review discusses the potential of both exogenous and in situ vaccination strategies to overcome these barriers and enhance anti-tumor immunity in PDA. Exogenous vaccines, including whole-cell, dendritic cell, peptide, and nucleic acid-based vaccines, have shown varying degrees of promise but face challenges related to antigen selection, production complexities, and patient-specific factors. In contrast, in situ vaccination strategies leverage conventional cytotoxic therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy, to induce immunogenic cell death and modulate the TME with the aim to stimulate anti-tumor immunity. While preclinical studies support the use of in situ vaccination, balancing the stimulatory and inhibitory effects is likely fundamental to eliciting productive anti-tumor responses in patients. Ongoing research seeks to identify new innovative strategies that can harness the endogenous immune response and trigger in situ vaccination. Overall, while both vaccination approaches offer significant potential, further research and clinical trials will be needed to optimize these strategies for improving patient outcomes in PDA.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentVaccinationAnimalsHumansImmunotherapyCancer Vaccinescancer vaccinesexogenous vaccinationimmunogenic cell deathimmunologyimmunotherapyin situ vaccinationpancreatic ductal adenocarcinomatumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39514560
PMCPMC11584293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.