ArticlePloS one2024
Good quality end-of life care for people with an intellectual disability: A critical interpretive synthesis protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with an intellectual disability face inequality accessing healthcare that extends to end-of-life care. Furthermore, end-of-life care for people with an intellectual disability is more complex than that for the general population. This protocol sets out how our review will explore the available evidence and identify the key characteristics of care that are required for people with an intellectual disability to have a good end-of-life experience. A critical interpretive synthesis approach will be adopted, combining some elements of a systematic review with interpretive synthesis. This approach has been selected as it allows a diverse body of literature to be considered. Furthermore, it is compatible with theory generation allowing new insights to emerge in an iterative process. Electronic databases and grey literature sources will be searched using pre-defined search terms. Following initial title and abstract screening, eligible papers will undergo full text screening. Papers that are deemed to be 'fatally flawed' will be excluded and remaining papers appraised for relevance. Resultant papers will be included in the sampling frame from which data extraction will occur. An existing framework outlining key factors in the provision of excellent end-of-life care to people with an intellectual disability will be used to support data extraction and synthesis. Data extracted will be integrated into a synthesising argument in the form of a theoretical framework. This will identify the key characteristics in the provision of care that are required for people with an intellectual disability to have a good end-of-life experience. The developing theoretical framework will guide further selection of relevant literature to fill any conceptual gaps until saturation is reached. Our review will add to the existing body of evidence, shedding light on the key factors necessary in the provision of care to ensure that people with an intellectual disability have a good end-of-life experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.