ArticlePloS one2024
Acupuncture for uremic pruritus: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUremic pruritus (UP) or chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is one of the most intractable dermatologic symptom in patients with chronic kidney disease. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to investigate the antipruritic effects of acupuncture on UP/CKD-aP and suggested a significant therapeutic effect, while the evidence supporting the application of acupuncture is limited.
objectivesThis study will assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for patients with UP/CKD-aP.
methodsData Sources: RCTs will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal and www.ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 31st August 2024. Study eligibility criteria: RCTs in English and Chinese conducted on UP/CKD-aP patients will be included. Participants: Adult patients diagnosed with UP/CKD-aP will be included. Interventions: All acupuncture interventions in the management of UP/CKD-aP will be included, compared with no treatment, placebo or sham acupuncture, or other treatment agents. Outcome measures: The primary outcome will be the change in the severity of itching evaluated by validated scales. Study appraisal and svnthesis methods: If necessary, a meta-analysis will be performed for the pooled therapeutic effect by Review Manager 5.3, or a qualitative descriptive analysis will be presented. The data will be transformed into the risk ratio (RR) for binary data and the mean difference (MD) or standardized MD for continuous data for analysis.
resultsThis review will update evidence of RCTs evaluating acupuncture for UP/CKD-aP. LIMITATIONS: Anticipated challenges contain the methodological and clinical heterogeneity in terms of evaluation tools and acupuncture interventions within included studies. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: It will benefit patients and impact health-care decision-making regarding the models of care that are feasible for patients.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42021257001.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.