ArticleMedical care2024
Measuring Patient Well-Being During Whole-Person Clinical Care: Lessons From the Veterans Health Administration Well-Beings Signs Implementation Pilot.
Article in Medical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embedded Research in a Learning Health System: How a Research-Operations Partnership Informed the Development, Implementation, and Scaling of VA's Whole Health System.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Measuring What Matters Most: Considering the Well-Being of the Whole Person in Health Care.Medical care · 2024Article
- Using Well-Being Measurements to Enhance Clinical Practice: Why and How to Ask Patients About Their Broader Well-Being.Medical care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring patient well-being during clinical care may enhance patient-centered communication and treatment planning. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) piloted the use of the Well-Being Signs (WBS), a self-report measure of psychosocial well-being, in clinical care.
objectiveTo understand early WBS implementation and health care team member experiences with its use before developing detailed support materials and finalizing the measure.
methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the WBS implementation pilot at 4 VHA facilities, including surveys of (n=4) Whole Health (WH) leaders/clinical leads, and semi-structured interviews with (n=11) clinical leads and team members. Survey data were characterized using descriptive statistics; interview data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis.
resultsFacilities supported WBS implementation by disseminating information to clinical team members, primarily during staff meetings (3/4 facilities), individual discussions (3/4), and email (3/4); only half provided training sessions. In interviews, some care team members expressed the need for more training on using the WBS in clinical care. Some interviewees also provided suggestions for changes to the draft measure, including response option format and question look-back period.
conclusionsAlthough there have been growing calls for attention to patient well-being in clinical care, our results suggest barriers to the implementation of well-being measures in this context. Findings were used to inform the development of enhanced training materials and make modifications to enhance the acceptability of the WBS to providers. Other identified barriers will need to be addressed in future implementation efforts, including bolstering leadership support and easing the added time and burden of administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.