Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514485›Full record

ArticleMedical care2024

Measuring the Well-Being of the Whole Person in Clinical Care, Health Research, and Population Health Evaluation: Findings and Recommendations From the XVIII Veterans Health Administration State of the Art Meeting.

Dawne Vogt, Benjamin Kligler, Kathleen Darchuk, Eric Elbogen, Justin M List, Tara McMullen, Jennifer L Murphy, Barbara Bokhour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dawne VogtDivision of Women's Health Sciences, National Center for PTSD, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.
Benjamin KliglerUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation, Washington, DC.
Kathleen DarchukUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Washington, DC.
Eric ElbogenNational Veterans Financial Resource Center, Rocky Mountain MIRECC for Veteran Suicide Prevention, VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO.
Justin M ListUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Health Equity, Washington, DC.
Tara McMullenUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Pain Management, Opioid Safety, and PDMP Program, Specialty Care Program Office, Washington, DC.
Jennifer L MurphyUS Department of Veterans Affairs, Pain Management, Opioid Safety, and PDMP Program, Specialty Care Program Office, Washington, DC.
Barbara BokhourVA Center for Evaluating Patient-Centered Care in VA, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn 2023, the U.S. Veterans Health Administration convened a State of the Art meeting to evaluate the existing evidence and make recommendations for measuring the well-being of the whole person in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation. In this article, we describe findings and recommendations concerning each of these health care system functions, as well as key takeaways from the meeting as a whole.

backgroundThere has been a growing call for health care organizations to expand their focus beyond disease-based concepts to consider both positive aspects of health and indicators of well-being that extend beyond the health domain. Yet, knowledge remains limited regarding how best to integrate these types of measurements in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation efforts.

methodState of the Art activities were organized into 3 workstreams, each focused on a core health care system function (clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation). Drawing from existing literature on the measurement of the well-being of the whole person in the assigned health care function, workgroups evaluated the existing state of knowledge and made recommendations for future work on well-being measurement in the health care setting.

resultsCross-cutting themes included: (1) difficulty evaluating the current state of knowledge due to varied use of terminology in this literature; (2) appreciation for the value of well-being measurement in each health care function; (3) need for additional research on the use and benefits of well-being measures, including their role as predictors and moderators of health and health care outcomes; (4) importance of ensuring that measures are applicable for diverse patient groups and adequately reflect the "patient voice;" and (5) need for additional leadership investment and resource allocation to support use of these measures in the health care setting.

conclusionsKnowledge from this meeting can be applied to enhance the use and application of measurement of well-being to improve patients' health and health care outcomes.

Indexed as

Population HealthUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsHealth Services ResearchHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39514485
PMCPMC11548809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.