Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514368›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2025

Recent studies confirm the utility of the omega-3 index.

William S Harris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William S HarrisFatty Acid Research Institute.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe Omega-3 Index (O3I) was proposed 20 years ago as not only a marker of body omega-3 fatty acid status, but more importantly, as a risk factor for fatal coronary heart disease. The purpose of this review is to document the continued and growing use of this metric in nutrition research. RECENT

findingsOf the 456 citations to the O3I in PubMed, 58 have appeared in the last 18 months. Several of these articles are reviewed, and they underscore the widespread use of the metric. SUMMARY: Although the O3I was originally developed in the cardiovascular field, it has since been used in the study of a remarkably large number of health conditions, all of which appear to be favorably impacted by higher levels of tissue omega-3 fatty acids as reflected by the O3I.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseFatty Acids, Omega-3Nutritional StatusBiomarkersHumansRisk FactorsBiomarkersFatty Acids, Omega-3

Identifiers

PMID39514368
PMCPMC11809719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.