Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514315›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Lamination-based organoid spatially resolved transcriptomics technique for primary lung and liver organoid characterization.

Shaohua Ma, Wanlong Wang, Jiaqi Zhou, Shangfeng Liao, Cheng Hai, Yibo Hou, Zhichun Zhou, Zitian Wang, Yingshi Su, Yu Zhu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Multiscale Construction, Evaluation, and Application of Organoids.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shaohua Ma *Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School and Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4995-2032
Wanlong Wang *Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School and Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Jiaqi Zhou *Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School and Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Shangfeng Liao *The Beijing Genomics Institute Research, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Cheng Hai *Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School and Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yibo Hou *Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School and Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Zhichun ZhouThe Beijing Genomics Institute Research, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Zitian WangTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School and Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yingshi SuSynorg Biotechnology (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., Shenzhen 518107, China.
Yu ZhuTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School and Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xiaoyong DaiTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School and Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yuan ZhaoThe Beijing Genomics Institute Research, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Sha LiaoThe Beijing Genomics Institute Research, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Yongde CaiSynorg Biotechnology (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd., Shenzhen 518107, China.
Xun XuThe Beijing Genomics Institute Research, Shenzhen 518083, China.

Funding

Guangdong Science and Technology Innovation Foundation 2023B0909020003MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 32371470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial-transcriptomics technologies have demonstrated exceptional performance in characterizing brain and visceral organ tissues, as well as brain and retinal organoids. However, it has not yet been proven whether spatial transcriptomics can effectively characterize primary tissue-derived organoids, as the standardized tissue sectioning or slicing methods are not applicable for such organoids. Herein, we present a technique, lamination-based organoid spatially resolved transcriptomics (LOSRT), for organoid-spatially resolved transcriptomics based on organoid lamination. Primary mouse lung and liver-derived organoids were used in this study. The organoids were formulated using the droplet-engineering method and laminated using a homemade device with weight compression. This technique preserved most cells in individual organoids while maintaining delicate epithelium structures in laminated domains that can be recognized through visual segmentation. The mouse lung and liver organoids were resolved comprising various cell types, including alveolar cells, damage-associated transient progenitor cells, basal cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, hepatocytes, and hepatic stellate cells. The distribution and count of cells were confirmed using immunohistology and identified with spatial transcriptomic features. This study reports an automated and integrated spatial transcriptomics method for primary organoids. It has the potential to standardize and rapidly characterize primary tissue-derived organoids.

Indexed as

LiverLungOrganoidsTranscriptomeAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingMiceorganoidorganoid laminationspatial transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39514315
PMCPMC11573637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.