Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514303›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Folding a single high-genus surface into a repertoire of metamaterial functionalities.

Xiangxin Dang, Stefano Gonella, Glaucio H Paulino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Shortcuts to flexible structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiangxin DangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0003-0737-9597
Stefano GonellaDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0003-3705-1808
Glaucio H PaulinoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.ORCID 0000-0002-3493-6857

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) CMMI-2027000National Science Foundation (NSF) CMMI-2323276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concepts of origami and kirigami have often been presented separately. Here, we put forth a synergistic approach-the folded kirigami-in which kirigami assemblies are complemented by means of folding, typical of origami patterns. Besides the emerging patterns themselves, the synergistic approach also leads to topological mechanical metamaterials. While kirigami metamaterials have been fabricated by various methods, such as 3D printing, cutting, casting, and assemblage of building blocks, the "folded kirigami" claim their distinctive properties from the universal folding protocols. For a target kirigami pattern, we design an extended high-genus pattern with appropriate sets of creases and cuts, and proceed to fold it sequentially to yield the cellular structure of a 2D lattice endowed with finite out-of-plane thickness. The strategy combines two features that are generally mutually exclusive in canonical methods: fabrication involving a single piece of material and realization of nearly ideal intercell hinges. We test the approach against a diverse portfolio of triangular and quadrilateral kirigami configurations. We demonstrate a plethora of emerging metamaterial functionalities, including topological phase-switching reconfigurability between polarized and nonpolarized states in kagome kirigami, and availability of nonreciprocal mechanical response in square-rhombus kirigami.

Indexed as

kirigamiorigamipolarizationreciprocitytopological mechanics

Identifiers

PMID39514303
PMCPMC11573573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.