Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514224›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Parental Acceptance of Fetal Tissue Donation.

Yousif Dawood, Maurice J B van den Hoff, Anita C J Ravelli, Bernadette S de Bakker, Eva Pajkrt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Reconciling the Use of Human Fetal Tissue in Research.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yousif DawoodDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maurice J B van den HoffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anita C J RavelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bernadette S de BakkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eva PajkrtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Human fetal tissue is essential for biomedical research, providing unparalleled insights into human development and disease. Objective: To assess changes in parental decisions to donate fetal tissue following termination of pregnancy after the introduction of the Dutch Fetal Biobank (DFB) and to identify factors associated with consent to donate. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study collected data from all individuals assigned female at birth (hereafter referred to as participants) who underwent a termination of pregnancy at the Amsterdam University Medical Center from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2022. No exclusion criteria were applied. Exposure: Introduction of the DFB on September 1, 2017, which offers the option to donate fetal tissue after pregnancy termination. Main Outcome and Measure: Rates of fetal tissue donation before and after DFB introduction and associations between patient characteristics (maternal age, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gestational age, and reason for termination) and consent to donation were assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression modeling. Results: Of a total of 1272 participants (mean [SD] age, 33.0 [5.4] years), 576 (45.3%) were nulliparous. The mean (SD) gestational age at termination was 18 weeks 3 days (26 days), and reasons for termination were primarily because of structural defects (567 participants [44.6%]), with only a small portion (58 participants [4.6%]) terminating for social reasons (eg, unwanted or unplanned pregnancy). Fetal tissue donations increased from 1.2% (8 donations among 663 terminations) before the DFB introduction to 21.7% (132 donations among 609 terminations) after its introduction. This rise was primarily due to a shift from collective cremation to donation, while individual cremation or burial rates remained stable. The consent rate was 30.3% (132 of 436) for participants informed about the donation option. No significant demographic differences were found between participants who consented and those who did not, except for gestational age; consent rates decreased with advanced gestational age (odds ratio per week, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94). Higher consent rates were observed for terminations due to social reasons (odds ratio, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.40-9.10). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that a substantial proportion of individuals may be willing to donate fetal tissue for biomedical research after pregnancy termination. Integrating donation options in posttermination counseling respects patient autonomy and could ethically increase tissue availability for research. Expanding biobanks and fostering international collaboration is crucial for standardizing practices and ensuring equitable research benefits.

Indexed as

Tissue and Organ ProcurementAbortion, InducedAdultCohort StudiesDecision MakingFemaleFetusHumansMaleNetherlandsParentsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39514224
PMCPMC11549655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.