Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514193›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2024

When to Start Population-Wide Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Marika M Cusick, Rebecca L Tisdale, Glenn M Chertow, Douglas K Owens, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert, Joshua A Salomon

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marika M CusickDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, and Stanford Health Policy, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Rebecca L TisdaleVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Glenn M ChertowDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, and Stanford Health Policy, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Douglas K OwensDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, and Stanford Health Policy, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Jeremy D Goldhaber-FiebertDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, and Stanford Health Policy, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Joshua A SalomonDepartment of Health Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, and Stanford Health Policy, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have changed clinical management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and made populationwide screening for CKD a viable strategy. Optimal age of screening initiation has yet to be evaluated. Objective: To compare the clinical benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of population-wide CKD screening at different initiation ages and screening frequencies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cost-effectiveness study used a previously published decision-analytic Markov cohort model that simulated progression of CKD among US adults from age 35 years and older and was calibrated to population-level data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors was derived from the Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD) trial. Mortality, quality-of-life weights, and cost estimates were obtained from published cohort studies, randomized clinical trials, and US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data. Analyses were performed from June 2023 through September 2024. Exposures: One-time or periodic (every 10 or 5 years) screening for albuminuria, initiated at ages between 35 and 75 years, with and without addition of SGLT2 inhibitors to conventional CKD therapy (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers). Main Outcomes and Measures: Cumulative incidence of kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT); life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime health care costs (2024 US currency), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios discounted at 3% annually. Results: For those aged 35 years, starting screening at age 55 years, and continuing every 5 years through age 75 years, combined with SGLT2 inhibitors, decreased the cumulative incidence of kidney failure requiring KRT from 2.4% to 1.9%, increased life expectancy by 0.13 years, and cost $128 400 per QALY gained. Although initiation of screening every 5 years at age 35 or 45 years yielded greater gains in population-wide health benefits, these strategies cost more than $200 000 per additional QALY gained. The comparative values of starting screening at different ages were sensitive to the cost and effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors; if SGLT2 inhibitor prices drop due to patent expirations, screening at age 55 years continued to be cost-effective even if SGLT2 inhibitor effectiveness were 30% lower than in the base case. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that, based on conventional benchmarks for cost-effectiveness in medicine, initiating population-wide CKD screening with SGLT2 inhibitors at age 55 years would be cost-effective.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisMass ScreeningRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsUnited StatesSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39514193
PMCPMC11549659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.