ArticleJournal of nephrology2025
Cost effectiveness of difelikefalin for the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus undergoing hemodialysis in Italy.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated pruritus is a condition that strongly impacts CKD patients and is associated with increased morbidity/mortality, and worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Difelikefalin is currently the only drug approved in Europe specifically for treating moderate to severe CKD-associated pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis. The KALM-1 and KALM-2 trials showed better efficacy of difelikefalin vs placebo and best supportive care. The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of difelikefalin according to the Italian National Health Service (NHS) perspective.
methodsA cohort model represented by four health states (No, Mild, Moderate, and Severe pruritus) was adapted to the Italian setting. The model used data from the KALM-1 and -2 trials for efficacy, integrated with other publications for HRQoL estimations. To assess the cost of disease management, a recent Italian publication on CKD-associated pruritus was used and a price of €27 per difelikefalin vial was assumed. The base case analysis over a 15-year time horizon, and an additional 10-year scenario analysis, were established. Additionally, both deterministic univariate analysis and probabilistic multivariate sensitivity analyses were developed. Discount rates of 3% were applied. An acceptability threshold of 40,000 €/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) was considered.
resultsThe results show that difelikefalin plus best supportive care is cost-effective vs best supportive care alone, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, in the base case, of €35,823/QALY. Both the scenario and sensitivity analyses confirmed the strength of the results.
conclusionsDifelikefalin was found to be a cost-effective treatment for the Italian NHS. These results support its reimbursement and its inclusion in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.