ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2025
Are S100B and VILIP-1 Involved in a Common Mechanism of Neuroinflammation in Major Depressive Disorder?
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the role of neuroinflammation in neuronal and glial cells in the pathophysiology of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) through different biomarkers.S100-B and VILIP-1 levels of patients diagnosed with MDD were evaluated before and after antidepressant treatment. A total of 65 patients diagnosed with MDD and 69 healthy controls were included. Serum levels of S100B and VILIP-1 were measured at the time of diagnosis and after eight weeks antidepressant treatment and compared with healthy controls. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) were applied to assess the severity of depression. In our study, although serum S100B levels were higher in patients before treatment compared to healthy controls, this difference was not statistically significant. Regarding VILIP-1 levels, there was no statistically significant difference between patients and healthy controls. A positive and statistically significant correlation was found between S100B and VILIP-1 levels in MDD group before the treatment. At the eighth week of treatment, a statistically significant positive correlation was also found between S100B and VILIP-1 levels. Our research is the first study to evaluate MDD through two separate biomarkers specific to glial and neuronal cells.The fact that S100B and VILIP-1 levels showed significant correlations in patients diagnosed with MDD both before and after treatment suggests that they may play a shared role in the pathophysiology of the disorder. The correlation between S100B and VILIP-1 may serve as a guide in understanding the pathophysiology of the disorder and in identifying new drug development targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39514156What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.