ArticleLa Radiologia medica2024
Percutaneous microwave ablation of HCC: comparison between 100 and 150 W technology systems.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Imaging-based 3D-printed anatomical models for preoperative planning in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a single-center pilot study, cost analysis, and systematic review.La Radiologia medica · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Technical and clinical outcomes of microwave ablation for HCC: a single-center retrospective analysis of percutaneous ultrasound-guided, intraoperative ultrasound-guided and CT hepatic arteriography-guided approaches.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Successful occlusion of a bronchobiliary fistula using percutaneous microwave ablation: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical study on ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- MRI management of focal liver lesions: what a beginner cannot fail to know.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the differences in efficacy and safety between the 100 and 150 W percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) systems in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent percutaneous MWA (Emprint™ HP Ablation System, Medtronic) between January 2021 and May 2023. We divided the cohort into two groups: Group 1, treated with MWA at 100 W power system, and Group 2, treated with 150 W one. Effectiveness was defined as the absence of residual disease at 1-month CT follow-up; safety was defined as the absence of grade II-VI complications.
resultsA total of 135 HCC nodules were treated with MWA in 87 patients with a median age of 66 ± 10 years: 76 procedures in 42 patients were carried out in group 1, while 59 procedures in 45 patients in group 2. Cases treated with 150 W had a shorter ablation time (p: 0.002; mean 227.37 ± 92.5 vs 180.51 ± 75.6 s (100 vs 150 W)) and a larger ablation volume (p 0.008; mean 13,920.0 ± 10,723.2 vs 21,241.4 ± 18,374.7 mm
conclusionsIn conclusion, these preliminary results showed a good correlation between intended-to-treat area and ablation volume and intended-to-treat area and ablation time for both Groups. A minor ablation time, and major ablation volume, but also a higher incidence of complications was observed in 150 W Group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39514155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.