ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Assessment of the development of the central nervous system in fetuses with fetal growth restriction.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the development of the central nervous system in fetuses with fetal Growth Restriction.
methodsA total of 146 pregnant women who underwent prenatal ultrasonography in Cangzhou People's Hospital from January 2022 to May 2024 were selected, all with singleton pregnancies. Among them, 73 fetuses were in the fetal growth restriction group, with ages ranging from 20 to 33 + 6 weeks. The indicators for evaluating the cerebral sulci included the depth and angle of the parietooccipital sulci, the width and depth of the sylvian fissure, the width of the uncovered insula, uncover insular ratio, the depth of the calcarine sulci, and the head circumference. The hemodynamic indicators comprised the ratio of the umbilical artery resistance index, the umbilical artery pulse index, the middle cerebral artery resistance index, the middle cerebral artery pulse index, and the cerebral placental blood flow pulse index. The above parameters were analyzed statistically.
resultsIn this study, the depth of the parietooccipital sulci, the depth of the calcarine sulci, and the width of the sylvian fissure were smaller in the fetal growth restriction group than those in the control group, and the angle of the parietooccipital sulci and the width of the uncovered insula were larger than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). The fetal middle cerebral artery resistance index, middle cerebral artery pulsation index and cerebroplacental pulsation ratio in the FGR group were lower than those in the control group (all P < 0.05).
conclusionsThe development of the cerebral cortex in FGR fetuses is slower than that in normal fetuses, and the alteration of fetal hemodynamics might be one of the reasons for the delayed development of the cerebral cortex in FGR fetuses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39514124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.