Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514119›Full record

Trial reportThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2024

Does Sleep Moderate the Effects of Exercise Training or Complex Mental and Social Activities on Cognitive Function in Adults With Chronic Stroke? Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Ryan S Falck, Ryan G Stein, Jennifer C Davis, Janice J Eng, Laura E Middleton, Peter A Hall, Teresa Liu-Ambrose

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Combined cardiorespiratory and resistance training for people with stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan S FalckAging, Mobility and Cognitive Health Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ryan G SteinAging, Mobility and Cognitive Health Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jennifer C DavisApplied Health Economics Laboratory, Faculty of Management, University of British Columbia - Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4293
Janice J EngNeurorehabilitation Research Program, GFS Rehabilitation Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-0788
Laura E MiddletonDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Peter A HallSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7730-0552
Teresa Liu-AmbroseAging, Mobility and Cognitive Health Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-5308

Funding

CIHR MOP-126130Jack Brown and Family Alzheimer Research Foundation Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise (EX) or cognitive and social enrichment (ENRICH) are 2 strategies for promoting cognition poststroke. Whether sleep moderates the effects of EX or ENRICH on cognition in adults with chronic stroke is unknown.

methodsA 3-arm parallel randomized clinical trial among community-dwelling adults aged 55+ years with chronic stroke (ie, ≥12 months since stroke). Participants were randomized to 2× per week EX, ENRICH, or balance and tone control (BAT). At baseline, device-measured sleep duration and efficiency were measured using wrist-worn actigraphy; self-reported quality was measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Participants were categorized at baseline as having good or poor device-measured duration, device-measured efficiency, or self-reported quality based on PSQI. The primary cognitive outcome was Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Plus (ADAS-Cog-Plus) measured at baseline, 6 months (end of intervention), and 12 months (6-month follow-up). We examined if baseline sleep categorizations (ie, good vs poor) moderated the effects of EX or ENRICH on ADAS-Cog-Plus.

resultsWe enrolled 120 participants in the trial (EX = 34; ENRICH = 34; BAT = 52). Sleep quality (ie, device-measured sleep efficiency or self-reported sleep quality) categorization moderated effects of EX (but not ENRICH) on ADAS-Cog-Plus. Compared with BAT participants with poor sleep quality, EX participants with poor sleep quality had better ADAS-Cog-Plus performance at 6 months (estimated mean difference for those with poor device-measured sleep efficiency: -0.48; 95% CI [-0.85, -0.10]; p = .010); estimated mean difference for those with poor self-reported sleep quality: -0.38; 95% CI [-0.70, -0.07]; p = .014). There was no effect of EX on ADAS-Cog-Plus for participants with good sleep quality. Device-measured sleep duration did not moderate intervention effects.

conclusionsExercise is particularly beneficial in improving cognitive function in adults with chronic stroke and poor sleep quality.

Indexed as

CognitionStrokeStroke RehabilitationActigraphyAgedChronic DiseaseExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedSleepSleep QualityCognitive functionEnvironmental enrichmentExercise trainingSleepStroke

Identifiers

PMID39514119
PMCPMC11632229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.