ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Clinical application of fly-thru in diagnosis of biliary obstructive diseases: feasibility, reproducibility, and diagnostic value.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the feasibility, reproducibility, and diagnostic value in biliary obstructive diseases using Fly-Thru (FT) technique.
methodsIn this single-center prospective study, patients with biliary obstruction who underwent both abdominal ultrasound and FT examinations were recruited between January 2013 and January 2023. 3D FT images (3D-FT) were reconstructed with FT volumetric data. Image quality was subjectively assessed by two radiologists independently. 3D-FT was used to determine the degree of biliary obstruction and compared with ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). Diagnostic confidence level, diagnostic accuracy and diagnostic duration of the two radiologists using 2D-ultrasound (2D-US) alone and 2D-US combined with 3D-FT were recorded respectively and compared.
results100 consecutive patients were enrolled (mean age: 59.6 ± 13.2 years; 52 men). All 3D-FT images were successfully reconstructed and most (75% and 66%) 3D-FT images were considered clear and highly useful for diagnosis with a good agreement (Kappa = 0.653). Benign lesions and malignancies presented differently in both 2D-US and 3D-FT imaging. 3D-FT was not inferior to PTC in determining the degree of biliary obstruction (p = 0.101), with the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, and positive predictive value as 90.5%, 26.7%, 1.23, 0.36, 77.6%, 50.0% respectively. Combined with 2D-US, 3D-FT significantly increased the diagnostic confidence level and diagnostic accuracy of biliary obstructive diseases (all p < 0.01), especially for radiologists with less experience.
conclusionApplication of 3D-FT in diagnosis of biliary obstructive diseases was considered feasible and reproducible, with satisfactory diagnostic value and clinical importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39514100What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.