Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39514077›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025

Impact of population size on population genetic analysis of Short Tandem Repeat (STR) allelic data, forensic and paternity parameters and its effect on forensic DNA analysis.

Hirak Ranjan Dash, Rhea Shetkar, Nora Rashid Al-Snan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hirak Ranjan DashSchool of Forensic Science, National Forensic Sciences University, Delhi Campus, New Delhi, 110085, India. hirakdash@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1954-6452
Rhea ShetkarSchool of Forensic Science, National Forensic Sciences University, Delhi Campus, New Delhi, 110085, India.
Nora Rashid Al-SnanForensic Science Laboratory, Directorate of Forensic Science, General Directorate of Criminal Investigation and Forensic Science, Ministry of Interior, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate STR allelic frequency database is the prerequisite for assessing the evidentiary value of DNA evidence. Four data sets comprising 50, 100, 200, and 500 samples were evaluated in 21 autosomal STR markers in the Indian and the Bahrain population. Allelic richness showed an increasing trend with the increase in sample size i.e., 193 and 201 (50 samples), 217 and 221 (100 samples), 255 and 238 (200 samples), and 292 and 285 (500 samples) in both the populations. TPOX and D13S317 markers did not show any increase in allele number, whereas SE33 markers showed the highest increase in both populations. With the increase in sample size, 70 (Bahrain population) and 100 (Indian population) alleles having < MAF were detected. Similarly, 37 and 47 previously undetected alleles could be detected when the sample size was increased from 50 to 500 in the Indian and Bahrain populations respectively. In the Indian population, Match probability, decreased with a 500-sample size, whereas, the PIC, PE, Heterozygosity, and PI increased with the increase in sample size. Further, database size did not show any statistical difference in the outcome of the Paternity Index value in the 50 paternity trio cases studied.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationMicrosatellite RepeatsPaternityPopulation DensityAllelesBahrainForensic GeneticsGenetic MarkersHumansIndiaMalePolymerase Chain ReactionGenetic MarkersAllele frequencyDatabase sizeForensic and paternity parametersPaternity index

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.