Observational studyNeurosurgical review2024
Systematic assessment of early brain injury severity at admission with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Observational study in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dexpanthenol and parallel stress-response alterations in the subacute phase after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Brain Lymphatic Dysfunction in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early brain injury (EBI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has been increasingly recognized as a risk factor for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). While several clinical and radiological EBI biomarkers have been identified, no tool for systematic assessment of EBI severity has been established so far. This study aimed to develop an EBI grading system based on clinical signs and neuroimaging for estimation of EBI severity at admission. This is a retrospective observational study assessing imaging parameters (intracranial blood amount, global cerebral edema (GCE)), and clinical signs (persistent loss of consciousness [LOC]) representative for EBI. The intracranial blood amount was semi-quantitatively assessed. One point was added for GCE and LOC, respectively. All points were summed up resulting in an EBI grading ranging from 1 to 5. The estimated EBI severity was correlated with progressive GCE requiring decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC), DCI-associated infarction, and outcome according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3-month-follow up. A consecutive cohort including 324 aSAH-patients with a mean age of 55.9 years, was analyzed. The probability of developing progressive GCE was 9% for EBI grade 1, 28% for EBI grade 2, 43% for EBI grade 3, 61% for EBI grade 4, and 89% for EBI grade 5. The EBI grading correlated significantly with the need for DHC (r = 0.25, p < 0.0001), delayed infarction (r = 0.30, p < 0.0001), and outcome (r = 0.31, p < 0.0001). An EBI grading based on clinical and imaging parameters allowed an early systematic estimation of EBI severity with a higher EBI grade associated not only with a progressive GCE but also with DCI and poor outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.